Libertarians generally believe that the actions of government should follow the same ethical principles that private individuals follow. It is generally believed that theft is unethical. Assuming that theft is immoral, should redistribution of wealth through government be considered moral?!
The morality of seduction is the principle that moral human relationships are voluntary interactions (some libertarians do call themselves voluntaryists). The morality of rape is the idea that moral human relationships can be coercive by the use of force. Is redistribution of wealth consistent with the morality of seduction or the morality of rape?!
See this video of Economist Walter Williams making the moral case against the redistribution of wealth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
The words seem so deep which I was trying to contemplate about it. But all I know the fact that government are trying to keep their wealth and won't let it share to those in need, keeping them in a higher position and still rule their community.
Post a Comment